[aprssig] IGate FIlter for AMSATS?

[Jess Haas]

I know the APRS-IS isnt currently designed for RF analysis but how much
extra bandwidth would be required to switch it from elimimating duplicates
to filtering them on the output by default?

It seems to me that this would keep the end user experience and amount of
traffic the same while allowing the ability for users to do RF analysis by
changing their output filters. It would of course significantly increase
the amount of traffic between the servers, but would it still be at a
reasonable level considering the bandwidth potential of modern internet
connections?

-Jess
KM6GVW

On Feb 24, 2017 11:32 AM, "Kenneth Finnegan" <kennethfinnegan2007 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Question (sorry I forgot the answer last time):  Where do we fix this.
>>
>
> Remind the users that the APRS-IS is not designed to be used for RF
> analysis.
>
> If you want to see local RF characteristics for the network, you need to
> publish I-gate RF logs somewhere online. The BALDI digi is a good example
> of how this can be done: http://baldi-aprs.kd7lxl.hamwan.net/
>
> --
> Kenneth Finnegan, W6KWF
> http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20170224/9ed694a9/attachment.html>