[nos-bbs] mbox fbb setting

kd6oat kd6oat at gmail.com
Sat Apr 2 14:00:10 EDT 2016


Maiko:
I set mbox to FBB=2 this morning shortly after reading your post. So far it
is behaving nicely. So if I experience a problem, I'll send you the log
file.
Ken

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Maiko Langelaar <maiko at pcs.mb.ca> wrote:

>
> I am quite sure the guys on this list that have been running JNOS for eons
> and eons will agree that mbox fbb 2 is the 'standard', that's what I have
> been using for over 10 years, and it has not changed. It's caused me very
> little problems from day one.
>
> I don't understand why select folks are having big problems with this, I
> really don't. I have yet to hear any of the seasoned guys and gals out
> there ever complain to me that FBB 2 is broken. Telling everyone on this
> list that 'mbox fbb 0' is the solution is counter productive.
>
> The real way to check for problems is to run a full trace 0x211 on the
> interface in question and then submit the trace so that I can see what
> is going on. That's the only way to analyze this stuff.
>
> I get frustated when I'm seeing all these 'mbox fbb 0' solutions popping
> up. Also, there's really not much to log in those cases, the best way is
> to simply trace the session and look at that.
>
> I wish some of the 'seasoned' guys would say something about this. Sorry
> if I'm putting any of them on the spot, but I've spent hours and hours on
> this stuff and it's getting frustrating trying to nail things down :(
>
> Maiko
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20160402/a658b1db/attachment.html>


More information about the nos-bbs mailing list