[nos-bbs] MPS and Ping - good ideas from WL2K
glennt at gbis.com
Tue Oct 22 02:15:40 EDT 2013
True. However both also know that a PACTOR II/III/IV modem costs mucho
bux while WINMORE don't.
73 de Glenn wb6w
On 10/21/2013 2:27 PM, Demetre SV1UY wrote:
> Hi Andre and group,
> This is probably because they realise that WINMOR can only work when
> HF conditions are very good without QSB, QRM, QRN and MULTIPATH
> DISTORTION (i.e. in the laboratory) where WINMOR can work nearly as
> fast as PACTOR 2, but it needs more than 3 times the bandwidth of
> PACTOR 2.
> In the real HF world though WINMOR timesout and fails wherus PACTOR 2,
> 3 and 4 continue working. This is because HF is full of QRM, QSB, QRN
> amd MULTIPATH DISTORTION. Heck even PACTOR 1 is more ROBUST than
> WINMOR on HF when you have QRM, QSB, QRN and MULTIPATH DISTORTION.
> The guys at WINLINK know this, even the authors of WINMOR know and
> admit but not in public!
> 73 de Demetre SV1UY
Speaking of recursion, where did the cynics go wrong?
More information about the nos-bbs