[nos-bbs] MPS and Ping - good ideas from WL2K

[Demetre SV1UY]

True Glenn

73 de SV1UY

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Glenn Thomas <glennt at gbis.com> wrote:
> True.  However both also know that a PACTOR II/III/IV modem costs mucho bux
> while WINMORE don't.
>
> 73 de Glenn wb6w
>
>
> On 10/21/2013 2:27 PM, Demetre SV1UY wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andre and group,
>>
>> This is probably because they realise that WINMOR can only work when
>> HF conditions are very good without QSB, QRM, QRN and MULTIPATH
>> DISTORTION (i.e. in the laboratory) where WINMOR can work nearly as
>> fast as PACTOR 2, but it needs more than 3 times the bandwidth of
>> PACTOR 2.
>>
>> In the real HF world though WINMOR timesout and fails wherus PACTOR 2,
>> 3 and 4 continue working. This is because HF is full of QRM, QSB, QRN
>> amd MULTIPATH DISTORTION. Heck even PACTOR 1 is more ROBUST than
>> WINMOR on HF when you have QRM, QSB, QRN and MULTIPATH DISTORTION.
>>
>> The guys at WINLINK know this, even the authors of WINMOR know and
>> admit but not in public!
>>
>> 73 de Demetre SV1UY
>
>
> --
> Speaking of recursion, where did the cynics go wrong?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs



-- 
73 de SV1UY
Demetre Ch. Valaris
e-mail: demetre.sv1uy at gmail.com
Radio e-mail: sv1uy at winlink.org
(to use my radio e-mail put //WL2K in the beginning of the subject line)
http://www.qsl.net/sv1uy