[nos-bbs] RIP broadcasts?

[kd6oat]

Jerome, for what it is worth, here is an excerpt from a rip.log file
recorded earlier today pointing to  each of your three 44 gateways

Sat Nov 10 17:05:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:05:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:05:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:10:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:10:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:10:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:15:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:15:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:15:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:20:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:20:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]
Sat Nov 10 17:20:00 2012 - Proxy rip pointing to [24.84.213.209]


On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:32 PM, jerome schatten <romers at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi Don...
>
> Yep... it's the F9 screen I've been watching. 0311 on encap certainly
> increases the detail, but at any level, there just ain't no RIP packets.
> It behaves exactly as if rip has not started, but it has as near as I
> can tell. How can you tell? rip staus returns the same thing (all zeros)
> even after 'stop rip'.
> j.
>
>
> On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 17:48 -0500, Don Moore wrote:
> > I should mention that <ctrl> c will stop the trace activity in lunux.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Don Moore <ve3zda at gmail.com> wrote:
> >         If you are watching the trace within jnos you should see that
> >         activity on the F9 screen. Also try using trace 0311 for more
> >         detail.
> >         Or from linux try this command and watch the activity..
> >         tcpdump -n -i tun0
> >
> >
> >         On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:22 PM, jerome schatten
> >         <romers at shaw.ca> wrote:
> >                 On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 15:31 -0600, Maiko Langelaar
> >                 wrote:
> >                 > Is your JNOS doing the encap or your linux ?
> >
> >
> >                 JNOS
> >
> >                 > Are is your JNOS running on a linux box behind a
> >                 firewall ?
> >
> >
> >                 Nope
> >
> >                 >
> >                 > IF you are a *registered* gateway, then you should
> >                 be seeing
> >                 > some type of RIP packets to both your 44 and your
> >                 commercial
> >                 > side IP address.
> >
> >
> >                 As far as I can tell, I am a registered gateway:
> >                 Details of gatewayTitle
> >                 Gateway IP 24.84.213.209
> >                 Subnet 44.135.160.32 / 32
> >                 Subnet 44.135.160.40 / 32
> >                 Subnet 44.135.172.130 / 32
> >                 Notes
> >                 Gateway Area: Vancouver,BC,Canada
> >
> >
> >                 > There's a hint, run a trace on your encap
> >                 > or your tun0 (to file), see if the RIPS are showing
> >                 there.
> >
> >
> >                 How to do this? Can I simply pipe the output in
> >                 autoexec.nos? trace tun0
> >                 0111 > /path/filename ?
> >
> >                 I've got trace tun0 0111 engaged and have been
> >                 watching it -- nada RIPs;
> >                 I see nothing but conventional activity.
> >
> >                 jerome
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                 > > Where to go from here?
> >                 >
> >                 > This makes me want to create a command that I can
> >                 get the sysop
> >                 > to run which will generates a map of how a system is
> >                 setup. Many
> >                 > times it's hard to diagnose something when you don't
> >                 even know
> >                 > how the JNOS is configured (physical network layout
> >                 included).
> >
> >
> >                 Good Idea!
> >
> >                 Best,
> >                 jerome
> >                 >
> >                 >
> >                 > _______________________________________________
> >                 > nos-bbs mailing list
> >                 > nos-bbs at tapr.org
> >                 >
> >                 https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> >
> >
> >
> >                 _______________________________________________
> >                 nos-bbs mailing list
> >                 nos-bbs at tapr.org
> >                 https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nos-bbs mailing list
> > nos-bbs at tapr.org
> > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20121110/9fbd6be4/attachment.html>