[nos-bbs] Unanswered emails & tracking REJ, FRMR, RNR, RR, AX25 performance

[Kerry Smith]

Maiko,
Something like that could help out, even attempting to fine tune
other features in the system.  Not just stations, but being able 
to tune ax and netrom features to a near perfect level, if it 
would be possible.  The snmp could be be the greatest help since
there are so many programs out there right now that can run a
snmp mib and bring back data.  MRTG would be one example, which 
is free to use and does a great job.

Kerry - n3nxo


--- On Mon, 10/18/10, Maiko Langelaar <maiko at pcs.mb.ca> wrote:

> From: Maiko Langelaar <maiko at pcs.mb.ca>
> Subject: [nos-bbs] Unanswered emails & tracking REJ, FRMR, RNR, RR, AX25 performance
> To: "NOS BBS Mailing List" <nos-bbs at tapr.org>
> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 1:18 PM
> Good day to all,
> 
> First of all, I must apologize for my extreme slowness in
> answering (or yet to answer) outstanding emails. Been a
> bit
> burnt out lately, and unfortunately when this happens my
> desire
> to attend to outstanding emails (about packet radio)
> withers.
> 
> It's not intentional, it's just a human's way of
> automatically
> defending against overheating of the brain and nervous
> system,
> and I will get to them shortly.
> 
> The main reason for this post has to do with me getting my
> baycom
> board fixed and working again. One of the things I noticed
> in the
> traces got me thinking. There really is no way to track RR,
> RNR,
> REJ, FRMR, and other packet statistics in NOS, is there ?
> If I
> could collect those stats on a per station basis, perhaps
> it
> would help me in optimizing the parameters (like drive
> levels,
> volume control, etc, etc). The reason I bring in 'per
> station'
> as a basis is many times there are problems specific to
> only
> my station and someone else.
> 
> Any comments ? Has anyone ever tracked this stuff ? It
> would
> take very little to add statistics code to JNOS to collect
> this information, so that it could be graphed. I would
> like
> to do it, so that I can better fine tune my baycom board
> for instance.
> 
> Or perhaps I am being too presumptious in saying that
> drive
> and volume levels have a direct correlation to the number
> of
> FRMR packets received ? In the end I just to be able to
> get
> more information to help me optimize my links.
> 
> 73 Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>