[nos-bbs] Using AMPRgw RIP updates with JNOS ...

[Mark Phillips]

I too use the tun method. I need the Internet of course to talk to other 
stations not on my radio LAN.

Below is pasted a sample from a "route" command as well as my autoexec. 
As you'll see all the routes are forced down my tun0 interface. I guess 
that's because they came in through there.

Are you suggesting that by taking the multicast routes I would be able 
to retain the encap ability? Perhaps this would make my stuff work again?

Since the demise of N1URO and his IPUDP gateway I've been cut off from 
the world.

44.8.0.0         24  tun0      137.110.222.208  2         262    0 

44.12.0.128      25  tun0      192.147.172.252  2         262    0 

44.17.0.128      31  tun0      76.89.108.68     2         262    0 

44.24.0.0        16  tun0      66.114.139.158   2         262    0 

44.26.0.128      25  tun0      192.147.172.252  2         262    0 

44.94.0.0        16  tun0      141.224.128.8    2         262    0 

44.129.0.0       16  tun0      118.22.1.194     2         262    0 

44.130.0.0       16  tun0      141.75.245.225   2         262    0 

44.136.0.0       21  tun0      203.5.58.162     2         262    0 

44.140.0.0       16  tun0      83.250.133.61    2         262    0 

44.142.0.0       16  tun0      141.75.245.225   2         262    0 

44.143.0.0       16  tun0      141.75.245.225   2         262    0 

44.147.0.0       16  tun0      121.98.130.16    2         262    0 

44.151.0.0       16  tun0      141.75.245.225   2         262    0


Auto exec at http://www.enicomms.com/autoexec.nos

Mark



On 02/22/2010 12:44 PM, Maiko Langelaar wrote:
> Mark,
>
>> Why would I need your new module Maiko ?
>
> Just sharing what I have found. You don't need to use it of course.
>
> Maybe I should be specific. I have a static internet IP address, have
> had that for years. My JNOS does all the encap, it's not done on the
> linux side. I have the so called classical configuration from SLIP
> days, which I then moved to TUN a few years ago.
>
> If I use the RIP client 'as is', it won't work. All routes show the
> 'tun0' interface', and nothing is reachable. I felt I had to make the
> modification for my system to be able to use them.
>
>> I'm already receiving the RIP statements into my 20h JNOS build from
>> the normal IP dissemination. What benefit would I derive from
>> accepting the
>> multicast?
>
> You must have a different configuration then (or do you) ? would you be
> willing to share it with us (including any rip entries in autoexec.nos).
>
> I've never used RIP up till now, so I'm still learning.
>
> Maiko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>