[nos-bbs] JNOS 2.0f for DOS !

[Brad Price]

Our group in Virginia is running a combination of the DOS and Linux versions. 
We use the Linux for the Heavy lifting and the DOS for compatibility. A 
stripped down JNOS 2.0d works great for what we are doing. We actually want 
some of the features curtailed to keep the operators honest and the eye on 
the ball. Take a look at www.ki4bwj.org/packet for more info. I can upload a 
copy of my config.h file for DOS if you like.

I will start the work on the f version tomorrow to integrate it into the DOS 
based section of our network.

73
Brad
KI4BWJ

On Friday 25 January 2008 18:28, Maiko Langelaar (ve4klm) wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> > And Michigan's AMPRnet (www.MI-DRG.org) can move forward ...
>
> If I may however ...
>
> JNOS 2.0f (even 2.0d) will have larger executable sizes then the
> original JNOS 1.11f distribution. The questions some of you may want
> to ask yourself in the DOS environment are these :
>
>    What advantages does JNOS 2.0f have over the original JNOS 1.11f ?
>
>    Is it *really* worth your while to move to JNOS 2.0f, even if it
>    means less available memory ? I suppose I could try to see what
>    combination of features in config.h will give the best available
>    memory, but I don't know what combination of features people will
>    want to configure in the config.h - it's too much work for me to
>    guess - so I guess I won't be doing that (really, I won't).
>
>    What I'm saying is that available memory will be a challenge !
>
> > We all appreciate ...
>
> My pleasure.
>
> Maiko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs