[aprssig] AMTRAK mobile from DC to Minneapolis via Toledo Oh

[Michael Pittaro]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:09 AM, Eric H. Christensen <eric at aehe.us> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> That information should be on the underlying map. Why would we need to
> mark static objects like those you suggested on APRS?
>
>
​That's a fair comment - ​

​nothing I listed is either mobile, or has a reasonable status for APRS.

I guess at a deeper level, I'm just trying to understand the mapping of
object attributes to symbols. It seems to be less formal than I thought,
and is less of a classification, more of a 'convey whats appropriate at the
moment'.  I think Bob clarified that in the parallel thread.

mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20180717/19c97581/attachment.html>