[aprssig] AMTRAK mobile from DC to Minneapolis via Toledo Oh

[Eric H. Christensen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

That information should be on the underlying map. Why would we need to mark static objects like those you suggested on APRS?

Eric WG3K






\-------- Original Message --------
On Jul 16, 2018, 17:58, Michael Pittaro < mikeyp at lhrc.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> ​Do we really need that level of detail in a train symbol?  ​
>
>
>
>
> ​Personally, I would rather see the symbol space used for ​'rail infrastructure' than details of the train itself.  Stations, level crossings, unguarded crossings, grade separations, tunnels, switches, etc, are interesting.  I believe the details of the train itself can be better communicated in other ways.
>
>
>
> I like the way the UN OCHA has organized their icons \[1\].    It's a somewhat different domain, but the icons are clear and readily identified.  Once you see something familiar, you can always drill into the details.
>
>
> \[1\] https://reliefweb.int/report/world/world-humanitarian-and-country-icons-2012
>
>
>
>
>
> ​mike​
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail
Comment: https://protonmail.com
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=YWo1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----