[aprssig] AT-Golden Packet 9600 works!
Robert Bruninga
bruninga at usna.edu
Tue Jul 19 19:31:29 EDT 2016
> What do you mean by level-4 network?
Link-by-link acknowledgment
> What are you actually trying to do?
Connect our string of 15 sites from Georgia to Maine as a 9600 baud packet
radio emergency backbone
> What's the use case?
Play Amateur radio
Bob, WB4aPR
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Bill Vodall via aprssig <aprssig at tapr.org>
wrote:
> > Again, 9600 baud has little advantage to normal APRS single packet
> > operation and mobile operation, but this test was focused on testing the
> > links for a potential level-4 network.
> > Bob, Wb4APR
>
> What do you mean by level-4 network?
>
> What are you actually trying to do? What's the use case?
>
> >
>
> We know 9600 works. It's been in use for 20+ years. At least until
> it, most of packet and too much of Ham radio has been greatly
> diminished by megabyte broadband and the ease of clicking on a web
> page...
>
> >
>
> 73
> Bill, WA7NWP
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20160719/4df8ccdd/attachment.html>
More information about the aprssig
mailing list