[aprssig] Another Clueless Balloonist On The Rampage With A Bad Path...

Lawrence LaBranche capdiamont at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 17 07:39:30 EDT 2014

Yes, digi, I gates, etc could be designed to rate limit. The problem here is the RF channel is getting slammed.

Lawrence LaBranche KI6ZQY

> On Mar 16, 2014, at 15:59, Tom Hayward <esarfl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM, qrv at kd4e.com <qrv at kd4e.com> wrote:
>> Can the network be designed to reject beacons sent too frequently
>> from the same source?
> Great question! I'd much rather focus on designing a more robust
> network than singling out specific bad actors.
> aprx supports rate limiting by source. Here's the section from the manual:
> The srcratelimit is like ratelimit, except it is applied per packet
> source call sign. In 3rd- party frames (i-gated and radio relayed) it
> is the innermost source callsign, otherwise it is packet source
> callsign. This allows regulating any single source callsign from
> flooding the channel (either by gate or digipeat.)
> Tom KD7LXL
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

More information about the aprssig mailing list