[aprssig] APRS on Android
Andre v Schaijk
aprs at pe1rdw.demon.nl
Mon Jan 24 14:58:23 EST 2011
Op 24-1-2011 20:12, Stephen H. Smith schreef:
>
> It's not practical or realistic to blanket gate packets from IP to
> RF. The RF channel is only 1200 baud. For you Internet types,
> that's a blistering 1.2 KB/sec! In turn, collision avoidance and
> reliable operation on RF requires that the channel not be loaded to
> more than about 25-30% or so of capacity -- the so-called "Aloha"
> threshold for a random access network. This lowers the EFFECTIVE
> throughput to about 300-400 baud.
>
> If an igate retransmitted everything it hears on the APRS-IS to RF,
> it would transmit nonstop, monopolizing the RF channel 100% of the
> time. And still not be able to remotely keep up with the Internet
> traffic. (The full APRS Internet stream is now a non-stop
> 150-200K/sec -- this is why one uses port 14580 filters to limit the
> firehose effect when connecting to the APRS-IS.)
>
> Because of the huge difference in capacity between Internet and RF,
> reverse igating ( Internet-to-RF) is normally limited to messages, ,
> directed to or from specific stations, but not transmissions like
> position reports that are "broadcast" to no one in particular. And
> then only if the addressed station has been heard on RF recently
> (usually within 1 hour) and "nearby" (heard direct or via only 1 digi
> hop).
>
> Some igates CAN reverse-gate other traffic on a very limited basis,
> but you have to make arrangements to "whitelist" your call with the
> igate operator in advance.
I did a test not to long ago reverse Igating.
on a dedicated 9k6 channel it is very realistic to stream a 500 km range
in europe and still only use about 50% or less of channel time, because
it was a dedicated frequentie there was no aloha effect or slottime and
txdelay problem, this improved efficency a great deal.
Andre PE1RDW
More information about the aprssig
mailing list