[aprssig] HF APRS new ideas

[Guy Mallery]

> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 08:29:07 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga at usna.edu>
> Message-ID: <20100531082907.AEP09823 at msan1.usna.edu>
>
> There is no need for that now.  I assume most fixed HF stations would feed the internet directy. And eliminating the FOURTEEN 
> extra bytes that the above path requires would have a tremendous improvement on the packets reliabiilty.  The number one killer on 
> HF is packet length.  Eliminating those 14 bytes on short packets would be only logical.


Howdy,

   Does anyone have an interest in trying 300bps FX.25 (on HF)?  I've
wondered if we're not guilty of trying to (repeatedly) cut our ways down,
until growth occurs...

TIA.

73,
Guy - W6MSU

http://twitter.com/w6msu