[aprssig] Re : Re : NWS ON rf

[Steve Jones]

On May 10, 2009, at    6:28 PM, rttyman wrote:

> This will be solution in your case for Italian hams not to see "ICP"
> on their end, if this "ICP" sign come to APRS-IS. But Zero not  
> assigned
> to any ham prefix 0ICP would not be a problem.


What exactly would the problem be?

The only problem I could see would be if somebody was foolish enough  
to gate all Italian traffic to RF.

Once again, setting a geographic range filter centered on Italy with  
an appropriate range would keep out all tactical traffic originated  
elsewhere that matches the callsign filter.

It's something easily setup on *your* end and doesn't require the  
other 99% of hams out there who don't seem to mind tactical traffic on  
the APRS-IS to do anything.

--
Steve <steve.jones at rogers.com>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20090510/4e64430e/attachment.html>