[aprssig] 6 meter APRS

Earl Needham needhame1 at plateautel.net
Wed Aug 26 13:23:49 EDT 2009


I was actually thinking of CW at 100 WPM or more, and yes, CW Skimmer seems to have the tuning problem licked. 

7 3
Earl
------Original Message------
From: Curt, WE7U
To: My Plateau Email Earl Needham
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: Re: [aprssig] 6 meter APRS
Sent: Aug 26, 2009 10:15

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Earl Needham wrote:

> However, I'm daydreaming of putting it on CW -- that would be
> legal on ANY amateur frequency (except 60 meters). At some point
> this could be a real advantage. I no longer program but I bet it
> would be straightforward to write software for CW instead of
> AX.25.

Yes, straightforward.  You don't even need audio out, just PTT and
GND (to the keyer input).

The more difficult part is needing stable rigs on both ends in order
to have automated software copy you (unless you're using something
like CW Skimmer I suppose).  CW signals are quite narrow.

You'd also need software to convert the received CW back into an
APRS type of posit, perhaps injecting it into the APRS-IS.

So...  How long in ms would it take to send a CW posit at 30 or
40wpm in Base-91 format?  50wpm?

-- 
Curt, WE7U.                         <http://www.eskimo.com/~archer>
    APRS:  Where it's at!                    <http://www.xastir.org>
   Lotto:  A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown
Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U.
The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"


KD5XB -- Earl Needham
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs
Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT
Posted via Blackberry


More information about the aprssig mailing list