[aprssig] N4243B is Back!

[Jim Duncan]

Budlisting is absolutely the wrong thing to do. We need as many possible 
ways to track and capture his transmissions out there as possible. If 
you blacklist him he'll still operate but it will make it even harder to 
track him down.

73 de Jim, KU0G

Brian Webster wrote:
> What difference does that make with a illegal operator? Even if they are
> listening they will more than likely continue to operate illegally.
> 
> In the case of this guy, if we could get all the APRS IS servers to budlist
> the call, it may take the carrot away for him to operate illegally. He won't
> show up on the IS stream no matter where he is. It may be quicker than going
> through the lengthy FCC process.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank You,
> Brian N2KGC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Bill Vodall WA7NWP
> Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 11:20 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] N4243B is Back!
> 
> 
>>  It is a MicroTrak 8000.
> 
> 
> Since it appears the APRS community has accepted the technology of
> these highly questionable transmit without listening higher powered
> devices, is all this much of a surprise?
> 
> Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 

-- 
73 de Jim, KU0G