[aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8

Rodney Baker rodney.baker at optusnet.com.au
Tue Jan 8 17:11:26 EST 2008

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 03:22:30 "Jason KG4WSV" <kg4wsv at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
> > Partly right.  Because the uncertainty is not a precise polygon;
> > it is a lack of additional precision.  It is an uncertanty of
> > the number of digits of precision by the sender, and an EXACT
> > transfer of that same uncertany to the recepient.
> So it's not precise, but it is exact. I'll have to think about that one.
> Maybe it depends on what my definition of is is?

You need to re-read Bob's sentence. What is EXACT is the "transfer of that 
same uncertainty to the recipient".

Rodney Baker VK5ZTV
rodney.baker at optusnet.com.au

More information about the aprssig mailing list