[aprssig] How about a new TH-7D with this?
Rick Green
rtg at aapsc.com
Thu May 24 10:55:20 EDT 2007
On Thu, 24 May 2007, gerheim at cox.net wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, the GPS units in cell phones use "lightweight" GPS
> algorithms. The math is faster, cheaper, and less accurate. I'm not
> familiar with the details, but my understanding is that a cell phone GPS
> capability is pretty poor.
Here's what I heard: They have a GPS 'front-end', but they pass the
timing information upstream, and the actual location is calculated only
when necessary at the cell-site, or maybe at a server upstream from that.
To provide location info at the handheld at a fix-per-second rate would
require more processing horsepower in the handheld or more bandwidth usage
on the link, either of which translates to $$$. That info was offered in
conjunction with the basic E911 functionality, supposedly a rarely-used
function.
That said, Verizon is now offering a 'VZ navigator' service on some
phones which delivers a moving-map display complete with service locator
functionality (read: advertising income) and driving directions to the
handheld. I have no idea where they've chosen to do the processing, and
how they've balanced the memory/CPU/bandwidth equation on that one.
--
Rick Green
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-Benjamin Franklin
More information about the aprssig
mailing list