[aprssig] PHG in APRS and Xastir?

[Robert Bruninga]

> Isn't there an parallel 'range' field that gives 
>another means of expressing the coverage 
>of a station?

But I don not reeommend using it.  There is no
such thing as a line on a map that can
properly display "coverage" to the precision that
such a line implies.  I think we need to get back
to PHG as simply a "consistent" way for people
to indicate the relative performance o f their
station and expect no more and no less.

Bob, WB4APR

Bill

_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org 
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig