[aprssig] Final version of New n-N aradigm
Robert Bruninga
bruninga at usna.edu
Wed Jan 12 15:13:42 EST 2005
Greg,
Thanks.
I think the check-period woiuld remain the same as for
the UIFLOOD command, so there wont be any new
command. It is justs internal stuff.
I think only one is needed. Since it will possibly see
multiple copies from multiple digis. The proof will be if
it only digipeats one of them.
Thus a 9.0 TNC will reduce all dupes at its site...
Best thing is that I will check with Kantronics.
thanks
Bob
>>> greg at clubnet.net 1/12/05 11:32:19 AM >>>
Bob,
This would be great, but I have reviewed the manual for for version 9.0
and the description of the UIDIGI command is identical to version 8.3
Also the example [ disclaimer;) ] regarding duplicate packet generation
for multiple in-view digipeaters remains in the manual. If they did
apply the checksum algorithm to the UIDIGI command wouldn't you think
there would be a checking period entry like is present in UIFLOOD and
UITRACE?
I'm still waiting to see some proof of the fix. Unfortunately it takes
multiple version 9.0 KPC-3 digipeaters (within view of each other) to
thoroughly test this out.
Greg
WB6ZSU
On Jan 11, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>> Another thing that would be slick would be if the darned
>> UIDIGI and UIFLOOD parms used the same checksum
>> dupe checker.
>
> This should already be in the new Kanotroncis Version 9.0
> ROMS. I have not heard of anyone test it for sure, yet,
> hwoever...
>
> Bob
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
More information about the aprssig
mailing list