[aprssig] New n-N and 28 versus 30

Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.com
Mon Dec 20 14:21:48 EST 2004

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Robert Bruninga wrote:

> I also wonder if it is also time to change  the common
> 28 second filter parameter in most digis' UIFLOOD, and UITRACE
> parameters from 28 to 32?
> It was set to 28 so that people running 30 second trackers
> would not get filtered out.
> These days, No one should be running 30 seconds *routinely*
> so why not change the filter to 32 so they CANT (routinely).
> Of course the SYSOP can change it to 19 seconds if he
> wants for any special event or for doing mobile coverage
> studies at a 20 second rate if he wants,...
> But in general, I dont see why we leave this floodgate
> open for such rare occassions.  Better to keep it closed
> most of the time and only open it up when needed..
> I'm changing all my docs to show this.  or at least 30 secs.

How about changing it to 40 or 45?  Hold-off on the trackers can
easily delay for several seconds on a busy channel.

Curt, WE7U.   APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"

More information about the aprssig mailing list