[TangerineSDR] 1530UTC to 2400UTC rm3`100 run comparison with Fredericksburg station

[Julius Madey]

Hyomin, thanks; whenever you can get to it.

But regarding the attachments yesterday and these today, what is your 
opinion on the RM3100 data recording?

The correlation between the 1530 to 1400 UTC run yesterday and the 
Fredericksburg Intermagnet plot seems to be very good.  I'm about the 
same longitude as Fredericksburg but a few degrees difference in 
lattitude so JJ will be interesting.

Unless my eyes are deceiving me, it looks like the RM3100 resolution is 
better than 5nT.  Keeping temperature variation of the RM3100 within 
0.3C during a run seems to have minimized whatever temperature 
sensitivity of the RM3100 that was previously reported.

I will ask PNI once again about temperature sensitivity but have not 
heard back since tech support said it would look into the data I provided.

Jules - K2KGJ

On 8/17/2020 9:41 AM, Kim, Hyomin wrote:
> I will need some time to get data back from Gil.
>
>
>
>
> NJIT logo <https://www.njit.edu/> 	*Hyomin Kim*
> Assistant Professor
> Physics
> Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research
> Institute for Space Weather Sciences
> hmkim at njit.edu <mailto:hmkim at njit.edu> • (973) 596-5704
> https://web.njit.edu/~hmkim/
> 104 Tiernan Hall, 161 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:43 PM Julius Madey <hillfox at fairpoint.net 
> <mailto:hillfox at fairpoint.net>> wrote:
>
>     Will post tomorrow, but first check shows good correlation between
>     the two data sets.  Will need confirmation from Hyomin re JJ data
>     for same time period.
>     Jules-K2KGJ
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/tangerinesdr_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20200817/890b7e6c/attachment.html>