[nos-bbs] Netrom Issues and G8BPQ #define or not ?

[Maiko Langelaar (Personal)]

Actually it IS defined in netrom.h, meaning it was meant to be a permanent
definition. I only noticed this after I posted to the list, sorry about 
that.

The question is useless then, if I could remove the post I would :|

M

On 2/20/25 12:55, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty wrote:
> I don't see a #define G8BPQ or a #undef G8BPQ in there and never heard 
> about that setting.
> Do you mean  #undef BPQ ?  What is in there but should remain #undef 
> as it isn't  compatible
> with a UNIX environment according to a note in config,h.
>
>
> Boudewijn (Bob) VE3TOK
>
>
> On 2/20/25 11:42, Maiko Langelaar (Personal) wrote:
>> So I am experiencing some very odd crashes from time to time, there is
>> a bizareness to them, so I am wondering how many of you running JNOS
>> with BPQ partners and you guys are using netrom to connect, how many
>> are compiling their JNOS systems with #define G8BPQ in their 
>> config.h, or
>> you are leaving it #undef ? I have to try and rule this out, but 
>> 'what if a BPQ
>> specific NR flag comes in' and IF JNOS is not compiled to deal with 
>> it, might
>> be a small chance it does not like it ?
>>
>> Part of this problem is that if I did not know any better, malloc is 
>> also returning
>> a pointer value of 0x100000000 ! The only reference to this I have 
>> been able
>> to find is a buggy malloc library (from 2010 I think), that can't be, 
>> no way.
>>
>> Usually my JNOS will crash every ~5 days from the above pointer 
>> value, but
>> then it also crashes the odd time when a Netrom Connect Request (L4) 
>> comes
>> in, and then sure enough that pointer value shows up. Tearing out my 
>> hair !
>>
>> Maiko / VE4KLM
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nos-bbs mailing list
>> nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
>> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org
>