[nos-bbs] Junk Headers
Chris Maness
christopher.maness at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 13:39:44 EDT 2025
I think JNOS puts X- headers on everything whether it was passed FBB
style or not.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:24 AM Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looking at a sample header, it may be a dumb question, but why was SMTP involved in this case? The recipient was AA6HF, and my BBS forwarded it to him, but neither Jack's BBS nor mine received the message via SMTP.
>
> R:250730/2235z @:KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Grand Terrace, CA] $:1KZQ_KQ6UP Z:92313
>
> >From kq6up at kq6up.ampr.org Wed Jul 30 15:35:39 2025
> Received: from kq6up.ampr.org by kq6up.ampr.org (JNOS2.0p.8) with SMTP
> id AA73862 ; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:35:39 PDT
> Message-Id: <73860 at kq6up.ampr.org>
> >From: kq6up at kq6up.ampr.org
> X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (OLDNDE:W6TJ-5 KQ6UP) -> Sending message
> In-Reply-To: your message of Wed Jul 30 14:21:00 2025
> <BGE4_AA6HF at aa6hf.bbs>
>
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org
--
Thanks,
Chris Maness
More information about the nos-bbs
mailing list