[nos-bbs] Further development

[Chris Maness]

I am running INP here using NORD><LINK stuff.  Looks like the node tables
even go out compressed.

Thanks,
Chris Maness
-Sent from my iPhone


On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:09 AM Maiko Langelaar (Personal) <
maiko at pcsinternet.ca> wrote:

> Thanks Gus,
>
> Yes I agree, i have not looked at it for EONS :(
>
> Charles actually sent me a link to some recent discussions on this very
> topics of INP, sounds like Paula (of Xrouter fame) and others have been
> talking about this in great depth, and the notes they provided will most
> certainly be useful in 'fixing' ? the current implementation I have going.
>
> Just when I was happy with releasing this, this very morning my AT code
> started giving me that damn 'loop problem', which I have not seen since
> some time in 2021, I suspect it happens when AT sources a *.nos file
> that has any line entry greater then 80 bytes, but I am not 100%, so
> testing that theory now. Also the ax25 load | save stuff is still giving
> me some challenges as far as correct time stamps, but at least the
> heard lists are kept going ...
>
> What was really cool was picking up 1 (just 1) robust packet frame
> from Southern Chile on 10 meters last month, direct to Winnipeg :
>
>   Thu Apr 25 13:06:28 2024 - scsptc recv:
>   KISS: Port 0 Data
>   AX25: 6W7RV-10->APTSCS v RPN1-1 UI pid=Text
>   0000  00 82 a0 a8 a6 86 a6 e0 6c ae 6e a4 ac 40 74 a4  .. (&.&`l.n$, at t$
>   0010  a0 9c 62 40 40 63 03 f0 2f 31 38 30 32 33 30 68 .b@@c.p/180230h
>   0020  2f 62 79 22 3e 3c 22 32 3f 52 3f 6d 57 4f 6e 20 /by"><"2?R?mWOn
>   0030  74 68 65 20 72 6f 61 64 20 61 67 61 69 6e 2e 20  the road again.
>   0040  37 33                                            73
>
> How cool is that, as another ham put it, 'good catch', yup :]
>
> Maiko
>
> On 5/9/24 07:58, Gustavo Ponza wrote:
> > Hi Maiko et al,
> >
> > at first, very TNX for all!
> >
> > Suggest, as further development of JNOS2, a completion of INP3
> > feature and, possibly, to fit the FlexNet protocol, too :)
> >
> > Netrom in general as of today is a new Babylon specially, as I can
> > understand, with the introduction of hundreds of, *worst manned*,
> > emerging nodes, which generate about 800 of false/dead unreachable
> > targets... the aim should be that to protect the JNOS2 :)
> >
> > TNX!
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20240509/db3eeae7/attachment.htm>