[nos-bbs] JNOS version 2.0k crashes...

[Michael Fox - N6MEF]

Really?

When I press B at the jnos> prompt, my screen clears (except for the status lines at the top) and I see:

Trying 127.0.0.1:telnet...
Telnet session 1 connected to Local BBS

JNOS (n6mef.ampr.org)

Login:

And, if I use F10 to flip back to the console, and type "tcp status", I see a telnet session.

Michael


> -----Original Message-----
> From: nos-bbs [mailto:nos-bbs-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Boudewijn
> (Bob) Tenty
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 7:27 PM
> To: TAPR xNOS Mailing List <nos-bbs at tapr.org>
> Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] JNOS version 2.0k crashes...
> 
> The "B" command is not the same as telnet as the parser sees that the
> "B" command is pressed at the jnos prompt
> and prints all that nice bbs stuff to the screen, There is no need to
> involve the tcp/ip stack.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> On 2016-08-05 03:55 AM, Michael Fox - N6MEF wrote:
> > I don't have a KISS connection to an FBB bbs.  But I did try:
> >
> > jnos> B
> > Log into mailbox
> > C <kiss-radio-port> <another-jnos-bbs>
> > Read mail, etc.
> >
> > No problems found.
> >
> > You've probably thought of this, and I'm just thinking out loud ...
> >
> > I wonder, does the "B" command, which is telnet, support IAC or not?
> >
> > I presume the shell's telnet supports IAC.
> >
> > So the telnet server port needs to match the client and perhaps that's
> different between the shell and the "B" command?
> >
> > Michael
> > N6MEF
> >
> >>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 16:31, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty <bobtenty at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> A fellow ham I installed packet for has the following problems with
> >> jnos2.0k...
> >>> Jnos crashes (freezes) a lot if he enters "b" from the jnos prompt to
> >> access the bbs and
> >>> go to for instance FBB over a kiss link and starts reading the mail
> >> there.
> >>> It doesn't crashes as far as we can see if the telnets to jnos from
> the
> >> shell prompt and
> >>> then starts reading the mail at his FBB bbs.
> >>>
> >>> I used gdb to get a backtrace but there is none.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 73,
> >>>
> >>> Bob VE3TOK
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2016-07-26 12:35 PM, Maiko Langelaar wrote:
> >>>> 2.0k.rc IS 2.0k - same thing, just rebranded.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maiko
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> nos-bbs mailing list
> >>>> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> >>>> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> nos-bbs mailing list
> >>> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> >>> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nos-bbs mailing list
> >> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> >> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> > _______________________________________________
> > nos-bbs mailing list
> > nos-bbs at tapr.org
> > http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs