[nos-bbs] multiple options for "start telnet"

['Gustavo Ponza']

Yes, you're right, it is positively so.

73, gus

On 04/25/2016 05:04 PM, Jack Eifer wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 3:13 AM, Gustavo Ponza <g.ponza at tin.it> wrote:
>
> I'm going crazy because all this messed up and inconsistent/
> incoherent soup of items: linfbb, bpqbbs, bpqnode, the
> leading point, the cronly, the enableiac, and so on...
> As Gus points out, there seems to be numerous  combinations and permutations of issues and solutions concerning this problem. I have to admit, I'm just as confused. Clearly, there's no 'one size fits all' fix.
>
>