[nos-bbs] DYNDNS in route add (was polling ?)

[Gustavo Ponza]

Hi Maiko,
TNX for confirming the below statements :)
So, definitively, no reason for not adopting such a
good feature for those 44er routing systems.

gus

Maiko Langelaar wrote:
> Morning !
> 
>>> so, why is it very arduous to encapsulate and manage ...
>>>
>>> route addprivate 44.134.32.233/24 encap i0ojj.dyndns.org
>>> route addprivate 44.134.33.71/24 encap i0ojj.dyndns.org
> 
> The ability to specify a hostname instead of an IP address in the route
> add command has been available since late 2004 and is documented fairly
> well in the existing JNOS2 documentation. Click on the link below :
> 
>  http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2/documents/manuals/JNOS2-MAN.txt
> 
> Search for DYNDNS and you will find it.
> 
>> The patch [below] may be one stab at the solution you look for ...
> 
> It has been a standard feature since that patch was put out.
> 
> Maiko
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>