[nos-bbs] Nos improvments, interfacing to Winlink...
maiko at pcs.mb.ca
maiko at pcs.mb.ca
Wed Jan 26 14:00:07 EST 2005
Bill wrote :
> It would be another big step if we could also use the F1B compression
> that Winlink, and I'm guessing AIRMAIL, is using.
I've had a few people suggest to me that since the SCS PTC is already
doing compression internally, is there really any benefit in compressing
the data being sent to the TNC ? Will doing so actually bog down the
effective throughput of the PTC ? I don't know off hand.
Anyone know of any research into this ?
>so we might be able to put telpack_node right in to NOS.
I'm not familiar with telpack_node. I've been meaning to see what
it's about, but haven't had the time. My understanding is that NOS is
already (in a way) a form of telpack_node, so why bother ?
Maiko
More information about the nos-bbs
mailing list