[nos-bbs] JNOS 2.0 - it's a start

[Bob Tenty]

Thanks Maiko.

Are you also planning a feature for dynamic hosts with ipudp/ipip
as you did with axudp?

73, Bob VE3TOK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <maiko at pcs.mb.ca>
To: "TAPR xNOS Mailing List" <nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org>
Sent: October 18, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] JNOS 2.0 - it's a start



> I copied smisc.c from my old source as you did forget to include it :=)

doh !!! got it, thanks. I'll update the gzip file later tonite.

> Would it not be better to include ipudp as option
> on the encap route line instead?

That's actually the way Barry K2MF did it. Perhaps I should just do it
that way as well to prevent mass confusion. Okay, I'll do it then.

My reasoning for the 'route protocol ipudp' was mostly to prevent a bunch
of code change. There are a *few* rt_add () calls that need modification,
and the 'route protocol ipudp' requires NO changes to any of that.

> I attached routes with ipip and ipudp  but I don't see any difference
> in the displayed routes.

Probably cause I forgot to add the new 'Protocol' column to the
displayed routes. I'll correct that as well.

Maiko


_______________________________________________
nos-bbs mailing list
nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs