[aprssig] Precedence Bit and IP Encapsulation

[Jason KG4WSV]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Iain R. Learmonth <irl at hambsd.org> wrote:


> You get to save a UDP header's worth of overhead,


That seems a pretty small win in exchange for requiring development of a
completely separate transport layer when there are a couple of pretty good
ones already sitting there.


> and it's an update to
> a protocol that already exists.


Is this the same standard that's falling out of modern kernels for lack of
development/modernization?

What's the use-case for an ax25/ip network?

Sorry, i don't mean to be argumentative (as I probably sound), I just don't
understand where you're going.

-Jason
kg4wsv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20200519/ec2cfad5/attachment.html>