[aprssig] 144.390 MHz might go away

[John D. Hays]

http://www.arrl.org/news/restraint-urged-in-response-to-2-meter-reallocation-proposal

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 12:46 Charlie at thegallos.com <charlie at thegallos.com>
wrote:

> No, he means the entire band from 144-146
>
> 73 de KG2V
>
> On Jul 9, 2019, at 3:39 PM, Tom Hayward <esarfl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:25 PM Joe Della Barba <joe at dellabarba.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You all may want to take a look at this:
>>
>>
>> https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/is-everyone-aware-of-the-risk-of-losing-the-2m-band-to-aeronautical-services.663878/page-15
>>
>> 73 de N3HGB
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> Do you mean 144.800 MHz?
>
> Tom KD7LXL
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20190709/cfc80b7e/attachment.html>