[aprssig] SSn-n model for coastal wx alerts

[Dan Srebnick]

Thanks to both of you...I thought the using the actual callsign should
work but was not certain.
I am going to give that a try.  I am interested in two specific
digis.  I am at the north end of the path to be covered and the two are
south of me.
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 08:07 -0800, Kenneth Finnegan wrote:
> If you're only interested in a specific two digis, you could instead
> generate two packets with specific paths of "DIGIA" and "DIGIB" or
> one packet with "DIGIA,DIGIB" to elliminate the need to get buy-in
> and continued support from other operators. 
> 
> Depends if they happen to have digipeating on their own call turned
> on. 
> 
> Kenneth Finnegan
> 
> On Nov 10, 2017 07:34, "Dan Srebnick" <k2dls at k2dls.net> wrote:
> > I live near the NJ shore and send wx alerts via RF that relate to
> > 
> > coastal waters.  There is no need to propagate these alerts inland.
> > 
> > There are a couple of high profile digis along the coast and I was
> > 
> > thinking about using the SSn-N model to create a via path that
> > would
> > 
> > ONLY get digi'd along the coast by participating stations.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I was thinking of something along the lines of MMn-N and then
> > asking
> > 
> > the operators of the two digis of interest if they would set that
> > up
> > 
> > using the UIFLOOD definition usually used for SSn-N.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Any thoughts or suggestions?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > aprssig mailing list
> > 
> > aprssig at tapr.org
> > 
> > http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> > 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20171110/c781c1fe/attachment.html>