[aprssig] Appalachian 9600 baud KA node Backbone
John D. Hays
john at hays.org
Mon Jul 17 18:58:33 EDT 2017
Are you sure you are not referring to line A which limits use of 420-430
within a certain distance of Canada?
Finding a common frequency in the 430-440 segment is more likely than
440-450. However, if you put the backbone on the 219-220 band you would
have greater range and much less competition.
I do have to put a plug in for the UDRC-II which can provide two radio
connections one for the backbone and one for user access (or two backbone
radios if desired).
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Bob Harris <knineudx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Be aware that there are restrictions on the amateur UHF (440 MHz)
> frequencies in New Hampshire. The restrictions are such that the DMR
> repeaters (at least in the northern part of the state) are on VHF. I
> believe Canada has priority to the frequencies for military use.
> On 7/17/2017 6:01 PM, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> We now have 4 in a row potential permanent sites for our Appalachian
> Golden Packet 9600 baud backbone possibly from VA to NY.
> If there is anyone that is very familiar with level 4 networking using the
> Kantronics KA nodes, please contact me. I want to make sure I understand
> how we could fully use the capabilities. And what UHF freq is good from
> Maine to Ga!
> Bob, Wb4APR
> aprssig mailing listaprssig at tapr.orghttp://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> "The world of goodness is filled with fleas."
> Bob Harris
> Can MOTCH Katmai Henry David Thoreau UDX Bda UD (1992-2005)
> Longmeadow Bradford Torrey CD (2001-2014)
> Ch Silvercreek Gossip Girl
> Bath, NH
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
John D. Hays
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig