[aprssig] New IGate Operator

[Shawn Stoddard]

Reporting over non-RF doesn't mean you're not on RF via voice. 





On Tue, Jan 3, 2017, at 13:08, Jason KG4WSV wrote:

> 

> 

> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jim Conrad
> <jjc at oceanviewcom.com> wrote:
>
>> My thought process is that positions no matter the source of actual
>> hams (not objects) should be reflected on RF which provides a
>> coherent picture for the RF stations.
> 

> 

> IMO you're sort of contradicting yourself.  How does giving a picture
> of hams on cell/IP give you a picture of RF?  It doesn't.  It's noise.
> If they're not on RF, then they don't need to be on RF.
> 

> 

> Now for non-APRS RF resources that may benefit by being announced on
> APRS, which what you may be headed toward, look at Bob's info here:
> http://www.aprs.org/localinfo.html
> 

> 

> -Jason

> kg4wsv

> _________________________________________________

> aprssig mailing list

> aprssig at tapr.org

> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20170103/d3ce2218/attachment.html>