[aprssig] UHF APRS

[Cory Vickruck]

Right, so what I have gathered is not to bother with UHF at the moment,
stick with 2m and use another transmitter.

Thanks all for the help,

PS: Sorry if I caused any problems with my question.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Scott Miller <scott at opentrac.org> wrote:

> Sending the entire NMEA string is a waste of bandwidth and leads to
> greater packet loss because of the long packets.  Base91 will give you
> plenty of resolution, and the !DAO! extension gives you an extra digit with
> the standard lat/lon format.  Please don't put new systems on the air using
> raw NMEA - that was a kludge for things like the KPC-3 from more than 15
> years ago.
>
> Scott
> N1VG
>
>
> On 9/28/2016 4:00 AM, Andrew Rich wrote:
>
> Cody
>
> I found you better accuracy out of APRS by sending just the full nmea
> string
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
> -----------------------------
> Sent from my iPhone
> Andrew Rich
> e vk4tec at tech-software.net
> w www.tech-software.net
> m 0419 738 223
>
> On 28 Sep 2016, at 10:57, crvickru <crvickru at lakeheadu.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you all for your suggestions from what I gather from the discussion
> it is impracticable to use this module. All of your comments and
> suggestions have been helpfully. I am reading more about aprs and it's
> capabilities what an amazing system.
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mark Cheavens <mcheavens at usa.net>
> Date: 2016-09-27 8:32 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: aprssig at tapr.org
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] UHF APRS
>
> defamation?
> Or did he deform you....
>
> Only since this is a "technical" group.
>
> Mark
> KC5EVE
> On 9/27/2016 6:03 PM, steve at dimse.com wrote:
> >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec at tech-software.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Cyber bully
> >>
> > Well, Andrew, we've covered this before. It isn't bullying, it is
> sarcasm, because my other attempts to make you act like a responsible
> member of the community, including hundreds of answers to your questions
> over more than thirteen years, have failed. If you don't want to hear any
> more, all you have to do is to use the SIG the way the other hundreds of
> people here do - don't report things that are not novel to APRS, don't ask
> questions a simple google response can answer, and if you answer questions
> make sure your response actually addresses the question being asked and is
> not simply a way for you to tell us all about something you have done or
> want to do.
> >
> >> Public deformation
> >>
> > That requires a something I've said to be untrue, what would that be?
> >
> > Steve K4HG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aprssig mailing list
> > aprssig at tapr.org
> > http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing listaprssig at tapr.orghttp://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20160929/0d1778f7/attachment.html>