[aprssig] APRS-WSPR APRS from anywhere!

Jason KG4WSV kg4wsv at gmail.com
Mon Oct 10 17:24:43 EDT 2016


On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Earl Needham <earl.kd5xb at gmail.com> wrote:

> No, no, no...  Just use CW instead of packet.


if you're going to use a computer to decode it, you have to pay the price
of a computer being much more stupid than a human.  you still have to make
packets out of the data if a computer is going to decode it, and if you
want it done effectively you have to use error detection (and maybe
correction) schemes.

Or maybe you're just talking about punting computers and using human to
human comms, and i won't argue that CW is extremely effective at that (as
long as you aren't talking to me, 'cause i'm just a no-code tech).

-Jason
kg4wsv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20161010/58d95b2d/attachment.html>


More information about the aprssig mailing list