[aprssig] APRS messaging issues
kg4wsv at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 08:09:45 EST 2015
> On Jan 6, 2015, at 1:59 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
> APRS operators must understand that ACKS in packet radio are much less reliable than outgoing messages.
This makes no sense at all. In general, an ACK has no better or worse chance at delivery than any other packet. In reality, a bare ACK is short, therefore slightly _more_ likely to be delivered without error. Again in general, messages are longer than the average APRS packet and therefore _less_ likely to be delivered without error.
All APRS packets (on RF) are datagrams with no guarantee of delivery.
Bob, I don't disagree with your suggestions for making effective use of APRS messaging, but let's get the facts straight. Why do you claim ACKs are less reliable than messages?
More information about the aprssig