[aprssig] program for linix

Ray Wells vk2tv at exemail.com.au
Tue May 27 22:36:24 EDT 2014


That's interesting, especially the figure for aprx. My installation of 
dixprs (with 3 radio ports, the server and the remote database enabled) 
sits around 33-34% for the main instance of dixprs.py. There is four 
other instances with cpu load =< 1% in each case. Maybe they're for each 
of the radio ports and the remote database. Might be worth asking Bela 
to clarify the situation.

Ray vk2tv

On 28/05/14 12:09, Lee Bengston wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au 
> <mailto:vk2tv at exemail.com.au>> wrote:
>     Lee,
>     How does aprx compare with dixprs for cpu loading? Have you ever
>     recorded those figures?
>     Ray vk2tv
> Well, I am recording them now.  :-)
> Dixprs fluctuates mostly between 19 and 21 percent cpu load, which in 
> my mind is not too bad considering the Pi is not very powerful.  Aprx 
> consistently shows "0%", which I assume means something less than 1%, 
> which is impressively low.  I think that shows how much more efficient 
> compiled applications can be as opposed to those written in 
> interpreted scripting languages like Python.  Also dixprs runs a web 
> server and interacts with a database, so that stuff probably makes a 
> difference as well.
> Regards,
> Lee - K5DAT
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20140528/ac7b47ff/attachment.html>

More information about the aprssig mailing list