[aprssig] program for linix
vk2tv at exemail.com.au
Tue May 27 22:36:24 EDT 2014
That's interesting, especially the figure for aprx. My installation of
dixprs (with 3 radio ports, the server and the remote database enabled)
sits around 33-34% for the main instance of dixprs.py. There is four
other instances with cpu load =< 1% in each case. Maybe they're for each
of the radio ports and the remote database. Might be worth asking Bela
to clarify the situation.
On 28/05/14 12:09, Lee Bengston wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au
> <mailto:vk2tv at exemail.com.au>> wrote:
> How does aprx compare with dixprs for cpu loading? Have you ever
> recorded those figures?
> Ray vk2tv
> Well, I am recording them now. :-)
> Dixprs fluctuates mostly between 19 and 21 percent cpu load, which in
> my mind is not too bad considering the Pi is not very powerful. Aprx
> consistently shows "0%", which I assume means something less than 1%,
> which is impressively low. I think that shows how much more efficient
> compiled applications can be as opposed to those written in
> interpreted scripting languages like Python. Also dixprs runs a web
> server and interacts with a database, so that stuff probably makes a
> difference as well.
> Lee - K5DAT
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig