<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Lee,<br>
      <br>
      That's interesting, especially the figure for aprx. My
      installation of dixprs (with 3 radio ports, the server and the
      remote database enabled) sits around 33-34% for the main instance
      of dixprs.py. There is four other instances with cpu load =< 1%
      in each case. Maybe they're for each of the radio ports and the
      remote database. Might be worth asking Bela to clarify the
      situation.<br>
      <br>
      Ray vk2tv<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 28/05/14 12:09, Lee Bengston wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAPF_JS+u8Yqap6J18y0eZuqVY26+MbgH6004OGrLuzOgWGUfcg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Ray
            Wells <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:vk2tv@exemail.com.au" target="_blank">vk2tv@exemail.com.au</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
                <div>Lee,<br>
                  <br>
                  How does aprx compare with dixprs for cpu loading?
                  Have you ever recorded those figures?<br>
                  <br>
                  Ray vk2tv</div>
              </div>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline">​
                Well, I am recording them now.  :-)<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline">
                Dixprs fluctuates mostly between ​19 and 21 percent cpu
                load, which in my mind is not too bad considering the Pi
                is not very powerful.  Aprx consistently shows "0%",
                which I assume means something less than 1%, which is
                impressively low.  I think that shows how much more
                efficient compiled applications can be as opposed to
                those written in interpreted scripting languages like
                Python.  Also dixprs runs a web server and interacts
                with a database, so that stuff probably makes a
                difference as well.<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline">Regards,<br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline">
                Lee - K5DAT<br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_default"
                style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;display:inline"><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:aprssig@tapr.org">aprssig@tapr.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig">http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>