[aprssig] Paths - Solution proposal
Mark Cheavens
mcheavens at usa.net
Fri Jul 18 21:16:17 EDT 2014
Bob,
What I have suggested would not eliminate
"source" routing, but only be a better/smarter
system based solution for "generic" paths.
- A specific source routed packet could be given
HIGHER priority based upon that alone.
- Think if you were in DC, but needed to "flood"
or try to flood packets a few 100 miles away.
- You could "source route" to that area
(with the highest priority) and then "flood" from that point around.
I like the idea.
Mark Cheavens
KC5EVE
At 09:29 AM 7/18/2014, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>I use source routing frequently. Â Rather than
>shotgunning my APRS packets in all directions,
>If I am doing something special (quite often
>actually) I will chose specific digipeaters by
>callsign to get my packte going in the right
>direction and then let it go out from there.
>
>Or the opposite, do a generic 1 or 21 hops to
>cover the area where I am operating but then
>letting it go one more hop to a known intended area.
>
>This is common when one is in the highest
>density of APRS traffic in the country, and it
>makes no sense to flood the greater mid-atlantic
>when a smart selection of an entry in the DIGI
>field can tailor the path to only the area of interest.
>
>Some people can just plug-n-play, but some
>others like to understand the network and hone
>their skills to use it effectively.. Â - by choosing where their packets go --
>
>Bob, WB4APR
>Bob, Wb4APR
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Jason KG4WSV
><<mailto:kg4wsv at gmail.com>kg4wsv at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:58 AM, Robert Bruninga
> <<mailto:bruninga at usna.edu>bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
> >
> > WHen was the last time you dialed 911?
> > I assume zero. Â Therefore we dont need it right?
>
>You are equating source routing with 911 service?
>
>I assume this response is to avoid admitting you
>have never used it, never needed it, and you are
>holding back the entire APRS network
>infrastructure to preserve a feature you think you might need one day.
>
>-j
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
><mailto:aprssig at tapr.org>aprssig at tapr.org
>http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at tapr.org
>http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20140718/b5349263/attachment.html>
More information about the aprssig
mailing list