[aprssig] RFC New Data Type Identifier?

[Robert Bruninga]

Use the Data Type Identifier for Experimental Format and list the
formats with me.
Or use a MESSAGE format and speak to/from the radio in messages. if
you want others to see it.

If the radio is a community resource such as a fixed HF rig intended
to be avaiable for moble operators to SHARE, then I would encourage
such things as (the radios reqquency) be sent in an OBJECT so that it
can show to all nearby mobiles to see what they may be listening too.
etc...

Bob, Wb4APR

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Bryan Hoyer <bhhoyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> As many of you know we are building a new digital radio that can be
> controlled OTA.
>
> If I define a command as anything that causes an action on the receiver's
> part. I do not see a DTI for commands, except for the following:
>
> ? Query
>
> < Station Capabilities
>
> Both of these elicit a response but are not generic command types.
>
> We need a single generic DTI for control of the radio, that flows harmlessly
> thru the system and yet is understandable by a passive observer.
>
> Should we use an existing type like:
>
> { User-Defined APRS packet format
>
> or is some other solution more appropriate?
>
> Inquiring minds want to know...
> Bryan K7UDR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>