[aprssig] 1200 vs 9600 baud

[Andrew Rich]

Most definitely

Someone should try making adsb for ham radio

The only thing is the bandwidth 

ADSB is just pulse position modulation. 

Except its at 1MB /s

I think it's about 7 MHz

Could be ok on 1200 MHz ?

It is awesome to hear a 'click' like static that translates to a position report 

Andrew 

Sent from my iPhone

On 21/12/2013, at 1:33 PM, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> Are there any components of ADS-B that might be transferable to a totally "new", UHF APRS system. We recognised years ago that ax25 has severe limitations and that better systems exist. Whilst we'll never change ax25 and 1k2 aprs it should be possible to devise an alternative network using new protocols to which users can migrate over a period of time.
> 
> My $0.02 worth
> 
> Ray
> vk2tv
> 
> 
> On 21/12/13 14:24, Andrew Rich wrote:
>> Been thinking about this for a while
>>  
>> I thought 9k6 was less reliable.
>>  
>> Wouldnt you be better off going like FL-DIGI ?
>>  
>> Fast RTTY
>>  
>> - Andrew -
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Hüseyin ODABAŞ, TA1DF
>> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
>> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 6:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: [aprssig] 1200 vs 9600 baud (was: Tracker3 9600 baud balloon tracker beta offer)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20131221/0f810038/attachment.html>