[aprssig] are write-only APRS-IS clients valid?

Pete Loveall AE5PL Lists hamlists at ametx.com
Mon Dec 2 15:58:02 EST 2013


You are basically correct except for #2, if I understand your statement.  Your follow-up statement is correct (recently heard list trumps filters).  Server-side filters are -additive-.  So you will always have #1 and server-side filters directly upstream from you will only add to #1, not take away.  This is a very common configuration where people want to see all "local" packets both on RF and directly injected into APRS-IS.

73,

Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete at ae5pl dot net



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Torrey
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 2:41 PM
> 
> 1) If I add no filters, I should be receiving appropriate messages to gate to RF,
> according to stations I have recently gated to IS.
> 
> 2) If I add filters (say, geographic), that could cause loss of some messages
> that should come back through me.
> 
> 3) If the server or servers in the chain to which I subscribe have filters (I
> would hope they don't, but for the sake of argument...), that would have a
> similar effect to #2.
> 
> In regards #2, I might like to have some filtering enabled for other reasons,
> but would hope the recently-heard list trumps (by including such packets)
> any filters I set up.



More information about the aprssig mailing list