[aprssig] APRS and dstar (why)
Randy Allen
ka0azs at earthlink.net
Sun May 27 16:51:28 EDT 2012
By $350 I assume you mean something like the IC-V80 and the optional
D-Star module? Which gives me a mono band HT with no GPS, one
additional operating mode. By the time you add a GPS we're looking at
the same price I paid for my TH-D72 and no way to to see any APRS
activity around me via RF.
ETA: I see you were referring to the ID-31. Now we've added the GPS but
have a 440 mon0 band HT with all the disadvantages as far as APRS
receipt, and not very useful around here for public services events that
tend to use the 2 Meter infrastructure.
I know that it's possible to port APRS to D-STAR, but the response I got
from the local D-STAR types was "why would we want to connect a piece of
old analog crap to our nice new digital repeater. You need to buy a
D-STAR!"
When comparing something more like apples to apples (i.e. a true dual
band mobile with dual display), then the price of an IC-2820 isn't much
of bargain compared to a D710, and I still don't have access to local
APRS activity.
I use APRS for public service events. The cost of replacing all of the
various trackers and APRS enabled radios with D-STAR is unrealistic,
especially in light of ICOM's apparent corporate, and the demonstrated
attitude of some local D-STAR enthusiasts, that "APRS Integration" is
all one way, and only through the internet, and no apparent interest in
seeing APRS station on their radios.
When I have the luxury of internet access at as Net Control, it's great
to integrate the D-STAR users, just as I do the DROID and other smart
phone users, but I don't depend on the internet, therefore I don't rely
on the D-STAR and smart phone users.
I would be willing to work with D-STAR community by working to get
TNC's, radios, etc to integrate with the local D-STAR infrastructure,
but I am quite frankly not interested enough in it to put up my own
D-STAR repeater, and they have shown zero interest in working with the
APRS infrastructure.
D-STAR to me is currently just another part of amateur radio world, like
EME, satellite, etc., that I might get interested in some day, but have
no real desire to fuss with right now. It just does not add enough to
the equation for what I do to make it worth it to _me_.
I'm glad you enjoy yours. 73
Randy
On 5/27/2012 14:29, Amateur Radio WB8NUT wrote:
> People really consider around $350 bucks for a DStar radio to be such a
> wall to impede their adoption of digital? I am amazed. Icom ID-31s sold
> out by early Saturday at Dayton this year. It has GPS built-in, no
> programming required and every time I transmit, my position goes to the
> APRS network. No more, radio, GPS and tracker module with wires everywhere.
>
> I guess when compared to the Chinese radios it is a lot of money. But
> compared to my D710 at $500, it's a great value.
>
> From personal observation of the Yaesu booth at Dayton. No crowd around
> their new digital radio. No excitement. If anything, it was such a flop,
> a number of people on the fence with digital started snapping up DStar
> radios. Some models were sold out and others in tight supply there.
>
> Not that I have abandoned APRS, but the ID-31 sure made it easy to have
> FM, Digital, world-wide programming, and APRS (DPRS) all in one package.
>
> I like DStar and like the way it is integrated with APRS. It's been a
> lot of fun with both technologies.
>
> Duffy
> www.wb8nut.com
>
More information about the aprssig
mailing list