[aprssig] Use of the 144.99 alt-input channel

[Phil - AD6NH]

Same problem with southern California.  That's right in the middle of 
our D-Star repeater sub-band.  Pretty difficult to get a nationwide 
coordinated frequency for anything anymore.

73 de Phil Pacier - AD6NH
APRS Tier2 Network Coordinator


On 05/02/2011 05:17 AM, ml41782 wrote:
> Bob,
> Just a Note on the use of 144.990
> In the Mid-atlantic Repeater Council (T-MARC) 144.990 is a repeater 
> frequency.  You have to go above that for another digital Frequency 
> i.e. 145.010
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun,  1 May 2011 10:32:27 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga at usna.edu <mailto:bruninga at usna.edu>>
> Subject: [aprssig] Use of the 144.99 alt-input channel
> To: aprssig at tapr.org <mailto:aprssig at tapr.org>
> Message-ID: <201105011432.020522 at msan1.usna.edu 
> <mailto:201105011432.020522 at msan1.usna.edu>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> A few thoughts on the proper use of 144.39 +600 alternate input channel:
>
> We were planning on using the 144.39 +600 input channel for our 
> special event in the Maryland Mountains so that our system can hear 
> the weak signals from the 5W walkie-talkies along the 40 mile trail on 
> 7 May.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20110502/d2b1e600/attachment.html>