[aprssig] 9600 APRS

[Earl Needham]

I guess 4800 would be a little improvement, but I'm really thinking of two goals here --

1.  A solution to channel congestion.
2.  An end to desensing a 2-meter voice radio.  Two meters is our most popular voice band.

It would be nice to move voice to 70 cm, but that's a long ways off for those of us "way out in the sticks".

Vy 7 3
Earl
KD5XB

------Original Message------
From: Scott Miller
To: My Gmail Earl Needham
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: Re: [aprssig] 9600 APRS
Sent: Feb 28, 2011 16:34

I'd rather see something more robust, like 4800 baud with lots of FEC 
and a better channel access control.

Scott
N1VG

On 2/28/2011 6:58 AM, Earl Needham wrote:
> I'd like to see a move to a band that isn't used for voice as much as 2 meters -- perhaps 1.2 would work -- and an increase in speed to 19.2 or maybe even 56K.  Of course, my bones will probably be dust before that happens!
>
> Vy 7 3
> Earl
> KD5XB
>
> KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>


KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry