[aprssig] !x!

la3qma at aprs.la la3qma at aprs.la
Fri Dec 30 13:01:54 EST 2011

Quoting "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb at homeside.to>:

> The spec page says "*no archive*", so I would think it should be
> transported through the APRS-IS, but not recorded by any APRS
> databases.  Otherwise, it would be a NOGATE or RFONLY if transmitted on
> RF to keep it out of the APRS-IS (IGate responsibility) and just don't
> even inject it into the APRS-IS to start with if you don't want it
> transported (originating client responsibility).

Ahh ok a little difference in "no archive" and RFONLY/NOGATE.

Don't see the point of "no archive" when you are public on RF/APRS-IS  
but people have different ideas about this than me...

RFONLY/NOGATE i can see the usage of..

Kai Gunter

More information about the aprssig mailing list