[aprssig] does anyone have the APRS spec 1.1 or 1.2 as a single PDF

[djhuff at rockwellcollins.com]

Bob,
I hate to point this out, but that is not a specification. That is word 
salad.  You have page number references to a document which we can not 
find.
For Example:

On your aprs11 webpage you state:
"Object Clarifications"
"Polygon and Line OBJECTS (new for page 31) "
When I pull up the OLD spec page 31, it is actually talking about DF 
reports, not polygons.  Furthermore, it doesn't tell me what you 
clarified, or what was wrong with the old wording.

You have references to page numbers on the aprs11 & aprs12 pages, but IT 
IS MEANINGLESS if I do not have the ACTUAL DOCUMENT it refers to.

And before you respond, my question is NOT about objects or DF reports, it 
was actually concerning something else.  Just providing an example.







"Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu> 
Sent by: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org
07/29/2010 05:14 PM
Please respond to
bruninga at usna.edu; Please respond to
TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>


To
"'TAPR APRS Mailing List'" <aprssig at tapr.org>
cc

Subject
Re: [aprssig] does anyone have the APRS spec 1.1 or 1.2 as a single PDF






> The "official" APRS spec (Ver 1.01) PDF has NOT been 
> updated in over a decade!     The only newer content 
> is in various "supplements" and "addendums"
> scattered around the Internet.

This is missinformation.

The updates are in www.aprs.org/aprs11.html
And in the www.aprs.org/aprs12.html

Go to the source.  APRS.org

Bob, WB4APR


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20100729/4736c98f/attachment.html>